<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Working Papers</title>
<link href="http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15</id>
<updated>2026-04-14T20:03:12Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T20:03:12Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Consumption Inequality in Botswana:  The Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient of  Consumer Expenditures</title>
<link href="http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/115" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mookodi, Lillian</name>
</author>
<id>http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/115</id>
<updated>2021-06-09T10:11:29Z</updated>
<published>2019-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Consumption Inequality in Botswana:  The Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient of  Consumer Expenditures
Mookodi, Lillian
This paper applies the Lerman and Yitzhaki (1985) inequality decomposition approach &#13;
on food and non-food expenditures on the 2009/10 Botswana Core Welfare Indicator &#13;
Survey; and the 2015/16 Multi Topic Indicator Survey datasets with an objective to see &#13;
how overall inequality translates into inequality within each expenditure component. &#13;
To test for a robustness of our results, we apply a simple bootstrap procedure to obtain &#13;
the means, standard errors and confidence intervals for the component Gini coefficients &#13;
estimates. The decomposition analysis results show that overall inequality based on the &#13;
Gini coefficient of consumption expenditure within the groups has increased between the &#13;
two periods from 0.498 to 0.533. These results suggest that this rise in overall expenditure &#13;
inequality is due to the increased burden in the household budget of non-food spending, &#13;
which tends to be more unequal than food spending. The consumption expenditure is very &#13;
unequal on non-food items like recreation and hotels; health; education and transport. &#13;
On one hand, lower Gini coefficients are observed for food; and clothing and footwear; &#13;
these commodities are considered as necessities among others. This paper finally offers &#13;
some possible policy measures to curb this consumption expenditure inequality.
</summary>
<dc:date>2019-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Ministry of Finance and Development Planning Study of Poverty and Poverty Alleviation in Botswana: Inception report</title>
<link href="http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/114" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis(BIDPA)</name>
</author>
<id>http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/114</id>
<updated>2021-06-09T10:07:27Z</updated>
<published>1996-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Ministry of Finance and Development Planning Study of Poverty and Poverty Alleviation in Botswana: Inception report
Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis(BIDPA)
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Competitiveness of ACP Sugar Exports in the Global Market</title>
<link href="http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/113" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Seleka, Tebogo B.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Dlamini, Thulani S.</name>
</author>
<id>http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/113</id>
<updated>2021-06-09T09:59:14Z</updated>
<published>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Competitiveness of ACP Sugar Exports in the Global Market
Seleka, Tebogo B.; Dlamini, Thulani S.
We employ the Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage (NRCA) index on data &#13;
for the period 1961-2013 to examine the competitiveness of the African, Caribbean and &#13;
Pacific (ACP) countries in the global sugar market. Results indicate that the majority of &#13;
the ACP states had comparative advantage in the global sugar market during the period &#13;
1961-2013. However, most of these countries also experienced declining comparative &#13;
advantage, except for a few African countries that emerged from initial states of extreme &#13;
comparative disadvantage to marginal comparative (dis)advantage. This occurred despite &#13;
the fact that these countries enjoyed tariff free access to the highly protected EU market. &#13;
Mauritius, followed by Fiji, Guyana and Jamaica, recorded the strongest comparative &#13;
advantage among the ACP countries. However, it recorded weaker comparative &#13;
advantage than the leading comparator non-ACP countries of Australia, Brazil and &#13;
Thailand, which experienced considerable increases in comparative advantage over the &#13;
considered period. Overall, there has been convergence in comparative advantage among &#13;
ACP states since the signing of the Lomé convention in 1975.
</summary>
<dc:date>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revealed Comparative Advantage in the Global  Citrus Market and Implications for South Africa</title>
<link href="http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/112" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Seleka, Tebogo B.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Obi, Ajuruchukwu</name>
</author>
<id>http://knowledge.bidpa.bw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/112</id>
<updated>2021-06-09T09:54:47Z</updated>
<published>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Revealed Comparative Advantage in the Global  Citrus Market and Implications for South Africa
Seleka, Tebogo B.; Obi, Ajuruchukwu
This paper adopts the Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage (NRCA) index &#13;
and data for the period 1961-2013 to examine comparative advantage among the leading &#13;
citrus exporters in the global market and draws implications for South Africa’s citrus &#13;
industry. Results reveal that Spain was the most competitive citrus exporter throughout &#13;
the review period. South Africa (SA) improved steadily over time from position four &#13;
to position two, surpassing Italy and Morocco in the process. Morocco, which ranked &#13;
between positions two and four, was also surpassed by Turkey, which improved from &#13;
position ten during the period 1961-1965 to position three during 2006-2010. Trend &#13;
analyses of the annual NRCA scores indicate that Turkey is on the verge of surpassing &#13;
SA in terms of competitiveness. Broadly, the results indicate that SA experienced &#13;
weakening comparative advantage during the apartheid era, owing partly to trade &#13;
sanctions by several European countries. With the end of apartheid and the subsequent &#13;
removal of the sanctions, the situation has vastly improved, further yielding a rise in SA &#13;
citrus competitiveness in the global market.
</summary>
<dc:date>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
